Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi Coupe fuel consumption

Of all Audi Coupe modifications produced from 1980 to 1996 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 9% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1990 Audi Coupe average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 1992 it was slightly above industry average, at 1994 difference became similar to average and finally at 1995 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersAudi Coupe
1990+5%+13%
Show all years
1991+4%+11%
1992+5%+7%
1993+5%+7%
1994+6%+7%
1995+5%+7%
1996+4%+7%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Audi Coupe.

1991 - 1996

Audi Coupe 1991 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines24.9 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.7 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+7%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Audi Coupe 1991 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Audi Coupe advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi Coupe 1991 2.3 E 133 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1991 2.0 E 116 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+10%
Audi Coupe 1991 2.0 E 116 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1991 2.3 E 133 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km+6%
Audi Coupe 1991 2.3 E 133 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1991 2.3 E Quattro 133 HP 4x4 manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+7%
2.6 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1992 2.6 E 150 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km+9%
Audi Coupe 1992 2.6 E 150 HP automatic 23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1992 2.6 E Quattro 150 HP 4x4 manual 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+7%
2.8 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1991 2.8 E 174 HP manual 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+14%
Audi Coupe 1991 2.8 E 174 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1991 2.8 E Quattro 174 HP 4x4 manual 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+4%
1989 - 1991

Audi Coupe 1989 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.5 MPG
9.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.9 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Audi Coupe 1989 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Audi Coupe advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi Coupe 1990 2.0 E 113 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi Coupe with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi Coupe 1989 2.3 E 136 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1990 2.0 E 113 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+13%
Audi Coupe 1990 2.0 E 113 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1989 2.3 E 136 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+13%
Audi Coupe 1989 2.3 E 136 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1989 2.3 E Quattro 136 HP 4x4 manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+13%
Audi Coupe 1989 2.3 E 20V Quattro 170 HP 4x4 manual 23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km+13%
Audi Coupe 1990 2.3 E 20V 170 HP manual 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+13%
Audi Coupe 1990 2.3 E 20V 170 HP automatic 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
1983 - 1988

Audi Coupe 1983 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.9 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+6%

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi Coupe 1985 1.8 90 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Audi Coupe with 2.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Audi Coupe 1984 GT 2.2 138 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1985 1.8 90 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1986 GT 1.8 90 HP manual 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+5%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1983 GT 2.0 115 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+20%
2.2 liter petrol engine
Audi Coupe 1986 GT 2.2 116 HP manual 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+4%
Audi Coupe 1986 Quattro 2.2 120 HP 4x4 manual 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1984 GT 2.2 138 HP manual 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+6%
Audi Coupe 1984 GT 2.2 138 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Audi Coupe 1984 Quattro 2.2 138 HP manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.