Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Audi A2 fuel consumption

Of all Audi A2 modifications produced from 2000 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2000 the Audi A2 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been slightly above industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersAudi A2All carmakersAudi A2
2000+4%+8% +5%+12%
Show all years
2001+5%+8% +6%+11%
2002+6%+8% +7%+11%
2003+6%+8% +8%+11%
2004+7%+12% +9%+12%
2005+8%+12% +10%+12%
2000 - 2005

Audi A2 2000 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines61.4 MPG
3.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+12%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter diesel engine
Audi A2 2001 1.2 TDI 61 HP automatic 81.1 MPG
2.9 l/100km
73.5 MPG
3.2 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Audi A2 2000 1.4 75 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+8%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Audi A2 2000 1.4 TDI 75 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+12%
Audi A2 2004 1.4 TDI 90 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km+14%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Audi A2 2004 1.6 FSI 110 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+15%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.