Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Alfa Romeo Stelvio fuel consumption

Of all Alfa Romeo Stelvio modifications produced from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 46% higher compared to advertised consumption. Since 2017 the Alfa Romeo Stelvio average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersAlfa Romeo Stelvio
2017+28%+46%
Show all years
2018+28%+46%
2019+28%+46%
2020+27%+46%
2021+26%+46%
2017

Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+46%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines49.5 MPG
4.8 l/100km
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.0 200 HP AWD automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.0 280 HP AWD automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+46%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.1 2.2d 150 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.1 2.2d 180 HP AWD automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.1 2.2d 180 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.1 2.2d 210 HP AWD automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
2.9 liter petrol engine
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 510 HP AWD automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 510 HP AWD automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.