Alfa Romeo MiTo fuel consumption
Of all Alfa Romeo MiTo modifications produced from 2008 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 29% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 35% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 22% higher. Starting from 2008 Alfa Romeo MiTo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2012 it was slightly above industry average, at 2013 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. Of course, it should be noted that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed quite significantly across the entire automotive industry during this period. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Alfa Romeo MiTo | All carmakers | Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
| 2008 | +12% | +24% | +13% | +22% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2009 | +14% | +24% | +14% | +22% |
| 2010 | +16% | +26% | +16% | +22% |
| 2011 | +19% | +26% | +19% | +22% |
| 2012 | +21% | +26% | +23% | +22% |
| 2013 | +23% | +34% | +27% | +22% |
| 2014 | +26% | +44% | +30% | - |
| 2015 | +27% | +44% | +33% | - |
| 2016 | +28% | +44% | +36% | - |
| 2017 | +28% | +44% | +38% | - |
| 2018 | +28% | +44% | +39% | - |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Alfa Romeo MiTo.
2013
Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 3 doors fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 45.7 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +44% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 69.2 MPG 3.4 l/100km |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 0.9 Turbo 105 HP manual | 56.0 MPG 4.2 l/100km |
38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km+45% |
| 1.2 liter diesel engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 1.2 1.3 80 HP manual | 69.2 MPG 3.4 l/100km |
|
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 1.4 78 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+23% |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 1.4 Turbo 135 HP automatic | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
|
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 1.4 Turbo 170 HP manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+65% |
2008 - 2013
Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 3 doors fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 38.4 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +26% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +22% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 liter diesel engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 1.2 1.3 JTDm 90 HP manual | 54.7 MPG 4.3 l/100km |
44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km+23% |
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 1.4 78 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+17% |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 1.4 Turbo 120 HP manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+31% |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 1.4 Turbo 16V 155 HP manual | 36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+23% |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2010 1.4 Turbo 170 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+32% |
| 1.6 liter diesel engine | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 1.6 JTDm 120 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km+20% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.